Women really need " False in menstrual period " ?

Women really need " False in menstrual period " ?
It is reported " the the intersection of woman and the intersection of rights and interests and the intersection of guarantee and regulations " that Chengdu draft might make one piece innovative to stipulate: Women can be invited in short leave according to the health in menstrual period. This one maintains that causes big dispute. (" evening paper of Chengdu " of June 29)
I think, should be clear at first, will stipulate that accord with China's present legal spirit, whom China implemented is the female employee including menstrual period at present " Five issues " Protect, but " Regulations on Labor Protection of Women Workers ",etc. has only stipulated the work taboo in menstrual period, and not involved having a holiday.
But, has made and already exceeded 20 years in " Regulations on Labor Protection of Women Workers ", the female employee that it delimited worked protection domain and way have been already out of date, should revise, itself is worth discussing. Should distinguish two relevant problems among them: First, on what respect, any intensity on earth do women need special labour protection; Second, is forming restriction on their work right to women's labour protection in fact.
Concrete in respect to menstrual period, how great on earth is it engaged in the influence of the normal work on women? Scarce to study in an all-round way in China at present, have, study, prove abroad, the impact on woman's average labour capacity is very small in menstrual period, an item of statistics that carries on in Jinan of Shandong reveals, only 1.6% of the women need to stay in bed in menstrual period.
We can believe, compared with the situation 20 years ago, nowadays women's body constitution has already been improved a lot, but the labour intensity in the work drops notably, it is perplexed that it is unstable though there may be weariness, mood,etc., but to most current women, especially not come to say by the physical labourer, insist in menstrual period the normal work is not difficult. Since it is so, menstrual period pathology and special regulation false menstrual period, it may be unnecessary, certainly, the situation that serious menstruation needs having a rest must be having, but this can actually include in the range of the sick leave.
By the look of general situation in the world, nowadays the range of the woman's special labour protection and variation tendency of efforts are not expanded and strengthened, but opposite. This is because people realize more and more women are not the weak in many aspects, they have enough ability to participate in the equal social competition, and for the excessive protection of the good hope, but may be limiting women's free choice.
As far as I know, Germany is clear to only offer special protection to pregnant and perinatal period and women breast-feeding their children, and the abandonment of some protective measures of working of South Korea is required by woman's rights and interests group. China may be a little more complicated: While a lot of due labour protection is serious and uncomplete, some unnecessary, restricted protection still exists. Then, it is essential for woman's rights and interests to follow traditional " five issues " while legislating Protect the thinking? What a damage of the right of not only guarantee the implementation of the essential protective measure but also avoiding causing women and working, perhaps this also needs further proving. (Frequently Lu Freelancer)
|