The coca-cola is asserted and produced and brought the worm Sprite Consumers obtain 2.05 yuan of compensation

The coca-cola is asserted and produced and brought the worm Sprite Consumers obtain 2.05 yuan of compensation
The coca-cola is asserted production " Bring the worm Sprite "
Have not opened the bottle and found similar cockroach's insect consumers the payment for goods of 2.05 yuan of compensation
It is reported ' Reporter Wang Lina) The high gentleman finds the about 3 centimetres long, cockroach -like insect in the bottled Sprite bought, he sues Beijing Coca-Cola Beverage Co., Ltd., claim double payment for goods of 4.1 yuan and spirit damage and conciliate 1 yuan of gold, and require the coca-cola to apologize in writing. Yesterday, the reporter learnt, the first instance of court of Daxing asserted the Sprite involved in the case was really Coca-Cola's production, the coca-cola compensates for the high gentleman's payment for goods to lose 2.05 yuan, other demands refuse to support.
In June of 2007, the high gentleman bought a case and 600 ml of Sprite held of each bottle from supermarket. The high gentleman claims, while drinking to the 20th bottle, he finds in the open Sprite, there is a about 3 centimetres long, cockroach -like insect. In 2008, the high gentleman will bring a suit before court, will require the coca-cola to compensate the Sprite fund of 2.05 yuan and compensate for the fine of 2.05 yuan, the emotional distress of the claim conciliates gold 10,000. In April in the same year, the court tries this case. In the mediation, the high gentleman has proposed the mediation purpose of up to a million, has not reached an agreement, the high gentleman applies to recall the lawsuit. Last year, the high gentleman was sued again, " public service lawsuit " of claiming ,Require the coca-cola to compensate Sprite fund of 2.05 yuan of its and compensate for the fine of 2.05 yuan and claim spirit and damage and conciliate 1 yuan of gold separately. In addition, he also requires the coca-cola to apologize in writing, and find out the production ink loophole.
The dispute focus of this case is whether the Sprite involved in the case is the coca-cola production. At the request of Coca-Cola, the related departments have carried on judicial expertise to the Sprite involved in the case. Last November, the qualification result about making in the department revealed, the Sprite bottle lid involved in the case did not have open trace.
In the intersection of court's trial and cross-examination, coca-cola approve this bottle bottleneck gush out yards of serial number, belong to whom company produce with the intersection of batch and the intersection of serial number and range of products, external packing, trade mark and its products are similar to. The court combines judicial expertise, think that can assert the Sprite involved in the case is produced of coca-cola.
The court mentions in the court verdict, " what should point out is, Beijing Coca-Cola is regarded as the beverage manufacturing enterprise with bigger influence, should strengthen the safety of food on supervision, the products produced must accord with the requirement which ensures the health and safety of human life and property, avoiding the products presents the hidden danger that may jeopardize the health and safety of human life and property, protect consumer's legitimate rights and interests conscientiously " .
It is reported, after pronouncing, the high gentleman puts forward appeal discontentedly.
|